Prediction of Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs Laura Pous-Tio Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs L. Pous-Tio

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger

GEO

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

1.73m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

134

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$30.0K

Career Money

$178.1K

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Laura Pous-Tio

ESP

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

1.73m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

134

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$30.0K

Career Money

$178.1K

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger 1 - 1 Pous-Tio

They have played 4 sets in total, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 2 and Laura Pous-Tio winning 2. The last match between Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger and Laura Pous-Tio was at the Ortisei, 31-01-2007, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger getting the victory 6-4 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger	1
Pous-Tio	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1) Ortisei(01-31-07)

Stats

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger

Laura Pous-Tio

(Q2) Internazionali Femminili di Palermo - Palermo(07-16-06)

Stats

Laura Pous-Tio

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs L. Pous-Tio H2H Profile

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger	Stats	L. Pous-Tio
$29,995	Career Prize Money	$178,084
53.24% (304-267)	Career Total W/L	60.55% (373-243)
0	Clay	1
1	Indoor	0
10	Titles	17
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs L. Pous-Tio Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Laura Pous-Tio has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Laura Pous-Tio has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Laura Pous-Tio has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Laura Pous-Tio winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 216/155), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/5). Laura Pous-Tio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 292/164), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 11% (W/L 1/8).
Player level: In the last year, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Laura Pous-Tio has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 1 times and Laura Pous-Tio being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 2 and Laura Pous-Tio winning 2.
The last match between Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger and Laura Pous-Tio was at the Ortisei, 31-01-2007, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Laura Pous-Tio has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Laura Pous-Tio has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Laura Pous-Tio has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs Laura Pous-Tio Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs L. Pous-Tio H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger	Stats	L. Pous-Tio
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	2
17	Games Won	21
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Antalya - 12-12-2016
R1 Ulrikke EikeriU. Eikeri	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Q3 Esen KokceE. Kokce	W	2-6 6-0 6-2	Stats
Telavi - 14-09-2015
R2 Polina NovikovaP. Novikova	L	7-6(10) 6-4	Stats
R1 Anna PribylovaA. Pribylova	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Beinasco - 23-02-2015
R1 Gioia BarbieriG. Barbieri	L	7-5 6-3	Stats

View All

L. Pous-Tio Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat - 01-05-2017
Q1 Martina TrevisanM. Trevisan	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Biarritz - 12-09-2016
R1 Rebecca SramkovaR. Sramkova	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Barcelona - 29-08-2016
SF Ioana Loredana RoscaI. Loredana	L	6-3 4-6 7-5	Stats
QF Martina Di GiuseppeM. Di	W	2-6 6-2 6-0	Stats
R2 Irene BurilloI. Burillo	W	7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs L. Pous-Tio Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger	Stats	L. Pous-Tio
53.52% (304/264)	YTD Win/Loss	60.65% (373/242)
52.17% (686/629)	Sets Win/Loss	58.71% (819/576)
50.84% (6109/5908)	Games Win/Loss	54.33% (6814/5729)
48.96% (47/49)	Hard Win/Loss	55.65% (69/55)
58.22% (216/155)	Clay Win/Loss	64.04% (292/164)
42.71% (41/55)	Indoor Hard W/L	42.31% (11/15)
0.00% (0/5)	Grass Win/Loss	11.11% (1/8)
0.01	Aces Per Game	0.03
67	Aces Total	169
0.04	Double Faults Per Game	0.1
213	Total Double Faults	636
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
587.54	Average Opponent Rank	583.98
62% (2372/3855)	1st Serve %	66% (9739/14848)
55% (1304/2372)	1st Serve Win %	58% (5637/9739)
41% (615/1483)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (2326/5114)
47% (193/413)	Break Points Won % (Total)	49% (977/1977)
43% (1609/3719)	Return Points Win %	47% (6977/14758)
18.18% (4/18)	Slam W/L	30.00% (12/28)
25.00% (1/3)	Masters W/L	45.45% (15/18)
0.00% (0/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
38.78% (19/30)	Main Tour W/L	54.94% (89/73)
54.78% (235/194)	Challenger W/L	63.34% (197/114)
73.77% (45/16)	Futures W/L	86.96% (60/9)
53% (299/559)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (365/606)
25% (1/4)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	67% (2/3)
48% (60/124)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	43% (45/105)
55% (99/179)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (90/168)
87% (282/244)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (373/327)
13% (282/38)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (373/46)
21% (286/59)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (242/46)